Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

The presence of the online book or soft data of the Law Of The Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil In The Rain Forest And The Lawyer Who'd Stop At Nothing To WinBy Paul M. Barrett will certainly ease individuals to obtain guide. It will certainly likewise save even more time to only look the title or author or publisher to get until your publication Law Of The Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil In The Rain Forest And The Lawyer Who'd Stop At Nothing To WinBy Paul M. Barrett is revealed. Then, you could visit the web link download to check out that is given by this website. So, this will be a very good time to begin enjoying this book Law Of The Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil In The Rain Forest And The Lawyer Who'd Stop At Nothing To WinBy Paul M. Barrett to read. Always good time with publication Law Of The Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil In The Rain Forest And The Lawyer Who'd Stop At Nothing To WinBy Paul M. Barrett, always good time with cash to invest!

Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

Free Ebook Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

The gripping story of one American lawyer’s obsessive crusade—waged at any cost—against Big Oil on behalf of the poor farmers and indigenous tribes of the Amazon rainforest.Steven Donziger, a self-styled social activist and Harvard educated lawyer, signed on to a budding class action lawsuit against multinational Texaco (which later merged with Chevron to become the third-largest corporation in America). The suit sought reparations for the Ecuadorian peasants and tribes people whose lives were affected by decades of oil production near their villages and fields.  During twenty years of legal hostilities in federal courts in Manhattan and remote provincial tribunals in the Ecuadorian jungle, Donziger and Chevron’s lawyers followed fierce no-holds-barred rules. Donziger, a larger-than-life, loud-mouthed showman, proved himself a master orchestrator of the media, Hollywood, and public opinion. He cajoled and coerced Ecuadorian judges on the theory that his noble ends justified any means of persuasion. And in the end, he won an unlikely victory, a $19 billion judgment against Chevon--the biggest environmental damages award in history.  But the company refused to surrender or compromise. Instead, Chevron targeted Donziger personally, and its counter-attack revealed damning evidence of his politicking and manipulation of evidence. Suddenly the verdict, and decades of Donziger’s single-minded pursuit of the case, began to unravel.      Written with the texture and flair of the best narrative nonfiction, Law of the Jungle is an unputdownable story in which there are countless victims, a vast region of ruined rivers and polluted rainforest, but very few heroes.

Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

• Amazon Sales Rank: #160650 in Books
• Published on: 2015-09-22
• Released on: 2015-09-22
• Original language: English
• Number of items: 1
• Dimensions: 8.00" h x .79" w x 5.18" l, .81 pounds
• Binding: Paperback
• 320 pages

Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

Review "Exhaustively reported and deftly written…reads like a John Grisham novel."—Forbes“Impressively even-handed. . . [Barrett] calls Texaco to account of dirty drilling, and holds Petroecuador, which maintained such practices for years, to the same standard.  He. . . thinks Mr. Donziger made a ‘deal with the Devil’, noting that the attorney even opposed the Ecuadorean government’s own environmental clean-up plan in order to preserve his lawsuit.” —The Economist"A well-crafted account." —Wall Street Journal"Those interested in the rule of law and the role of the courts and lawyers will find Law of the Jungle instructive, entertaining, and frightening." —The American Spectator“A mind-boggling house of mirrors… [Barrett] unravels and imposes order on a confusing, multiyear circus and convincingly sorts out the guilty from the merely depraved." —San Francisco Chronicle"Bloomberg Businessweek writer Paul M. Barrett offers a thorough account of the episode…The story is one of hardball corporate lawyers vs. hardball human rights lawyers, a rough kind of moral equivalency in a battle in which Donziger and his allies were finally tempted into acts that a U.S. judge would in the end rule to be racketeering." —National Review“A richly detailed and well-documented narrative of one of the most important environmental litigations in decades… Worthy of a Hollywood movie—but one that proves the point that truth is stranger than fiction.” -New York Law Journal"Details hardball tactics by both sides...Crisply told." —Dallas Morning News“An enthralling true-life courtroom drama…Almost Shakespearean in scope, featuring a flawed protagonist with good intentions but tragically overreaching ambitions.” —Booklist"An accessible, fast-paced read."—Fortune"Irresistable…a true-life, courtroom version of Heart of Darkness."—Kirkus Reviews“An enthralling, deeply researched volume about the intersection of law and individual rights…Barrett skillfully takes readers inside the players' minds and exposes the underside of high-stakes litigation.” –Library Journal“In a story possessing ‘no shortage of knaves and villains,’ Barrett skillfully weighs the ethics of both Donziger and Chevron and finds them wanting.” —Publishers Weekly“This chilling account of the bruising, bare-knuckled conflict between a deeply flawed do-gooder and a well-oiled legal steamrolling machine should give pause to anyone who believes that justice always prevails.  Barrett brilliantly shows that in the real world, the law of the jungle—an oxymoron if there ever was one—trumps the rule of law.” —Alan Dershowitz, professor, Harvard Law School, and author, Taking the Stand: My Life in the Law“Law of the Jungle is a riveting piece of storytelling. The environmental insults make you furious and your heart breaks for the people whose ways of life are violated—but what happens after that challenges your beliefs about fairness and justice....This isn’t a simple David and Goliath story; it’s an engaging passion play that unfolds from the Ecuadorian jungles to the courtrooms of New York.”—David Yarnold, President & CEO, National Audubon Society "Paul Barrett's Law of the Jungle is a cautionary tale -- a deeply reported, well-written reminder that to be credible and effective, the fight against environmental misconduct must be waged within the rule of law. Our legal system can be a powerful force for environmental progress, but its rules have to be respected."  —Fred Krupp, President, Environmental Defense Fund“This smart and gripping book by a first-class investigative journalist teaches a vital lesson that everyone who cares about business and the American economy needs to understand: When confronted with fraudulent courtroom shakedowns, corporations must fight back as Chevron did.” —Jack Welch, former Chairman and CEO of General Electric and bestselling author of Winning“Paul Barrett's Law of the Jungle is the inside story of the international trial of the decade—a high stakes fight over oil, blood and money and a protagonist who is as fascinating as he is perplexing.”—Jeffrey Toobin, author of The Oath and the Nine“An engrossing, captivating account of litigation run amok. Barrett’s comprehensive, detailed book demonstrates all that is wrong with the American litigation system. Required reading for anyone who not only wants to learn more about protracted lawsuits in America but yearns for a page-turning legal thriller. I can’t wait for the movie.”—Kenneth R. Feinberg, court-appointed special master for compensating victims of the 9/11 attacks, BP oil spill, Virginia Tech massacre, asbestos insulation, Dalkon Shield IUD, and Vietnam defoliant Agent Orange“Paul Barrett’s Law of the Jungle creates an unforgettable rainbow of lawyers who do indeed live by the Law of the Jungle. You will be intrigued until the last page as to who will survive and your emotions will be struck to ask, who should?”—Victor Schwartz, general counsel, American Tort Reform Association; partner, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Washington D.C.“Masterfully written and carefully documented, Law of the Jungle tells the real story behind the historic Chevron oil pollution case, which I saw from the inside as technical consultant and court expert for the rain forest plaintiffs.”—David L. Russell, P.E., chief executive, Global Environmental Operations Inc.From the Hardcover edition.

About the Author Paul M. Barrett is an assistant managing editor and senior writer at Bloomberg Businessweek.  He is the author of the New York Times bestseller Glock: The Rise of America’s Gun, American Islam: The Struggle for the Soul of a Religion, and The Good Black:  A True Story of Race in America.  He lives and works in New York City.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Chapter OneSURVEILLANCEThe lawyer Steven Donziger stepped out onto 104th Street. He looked west toward Riverside Park and east toward Broadway. The dark sedans had been tailing him for at least a month now. They followed him for blocks at a time, slowing when he slowed, stopping when he stopped, their passengers watching his every move.Donziger lived on a quiet block on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. He worked from home, a two-bedroom apartment he shared with his wife, their five-year-old son, and a cocker spaniel. Photographs and artwork from Latin America adorned the apartment. Documents in cardboard boxes surrounded the dining table. In the narrow foyer, stacks of stapled legal filings competed for space with a mud-spattered mountain bike.On this morning in the spring of 2012, Donziger had wheeled the bicycle down the hall to the elevator and across the marble-floored lobby. Fifty years old, he dressed like a graduate student, in jeans, unironed button-down shirt, and tattered jacket.“Como estas?” he asked the doorman as they bumped fists.“Bien, muy bien, senor.”Then Donziger had emerged from the building and, as was his habit, searched for the dark sedans. Six-foot-four and powerfully built, he would not have been difficult to track. Sometimes, in addition to the cars, he thought he saw men on foot, pretending to peer into store windows if he looked their way.Donziger began pedaling toward Ocean Grill, a seafood restaurant where he did business over lunch. As he approached the corner, he glanced over his shoulder in time to see the large car pull out of its parking space and fall in behind him. He didn’t fear actual physical harm. The company was too smart, he thought, to turn him into a martyr. It wanted to distract him, intimidate him.He despised his corporate foes: their money, their influence, their cynical disrespect for his clients in the Amazonian rain forest of northeastern Ecuador. The company would never willingly pay what it owed. Its lawyers and lobbyists had said as much. Now they were coming after him, making it personal. He’d written down license plate numbers, but the police weren’t interested. Every day people killed each other in New York. What did he expect the police to do about cars that might or might not have been following him?The surveillance wasn’t his main worry. A year earlier, in February 2011, the company had sued him. The 193-page suit, filed under the federal antiracketeering statute, alleged that he had ginned up fraudulent evidence as part of a conspiracy to extort the company. A federal judge had taken the accusations seriously. The judge forced him to turn over his hard drives, e‑mail, and boxes of documents. Donziger had said some truly dumb things--he admitted that much--and now they were public. His bravado sounded incriminating, he also acknowledged, especially if it was taken out of context. He’d cut a few corners, used tactics they didn’t teach back at Harvard Law School. He could lose his law license. Conceivably, the U.S. Attorney’s Office could bring criminal charges.The company, as Donziger saw it, fought dirty; he fought back in kind. Slugging it out, he’d pulled off something amazing. His ragtag team had gone to a provincial Ecuadorian courtroom and won a judgment that mighty Texaco had ruined the lives of thousands of farmers and Amazon tribesmen. Because of him, a tiny third-world nation had spoken truth to power. Donziger had pressed the case for nearly twenty years now, beginning as the most junior member of the plaintiffs’ legal team and ultimately rising to field commander. Before going after Texaco (which was acquired in 2001 by Chevron), he’d never brought even a slip-and-fall suit. That he’d survived this long must have shocked the oil company and its lawyers. No wonder they were branding him a racketeer and prying into his personal life.He was not alone, though. Impressed by the potential for gargantuan legal fees, Patton Boggs, a tough corporate law firm, had joined Donziger. Together, they were seeking liens against refineries, terminals, and tankers worldwide. He’d retained a famous white-collar defense attorney to represent him in the racketeering suit. The Amazon pollution case had been featured on 60 Minutes and in the New York Times, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Bloomberg Businessweek. In 2009, it was the subject of an acclaimed documentary that played at the Sundance Film Festival. A rock star in green-activism circles, Donziger had received support from Bianca Jagger, Sting, and Sting’s wife, the actress Trudie Styler. He had given Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie a private tour of the oil zone in Ecuador.“I cannot believe what we have accomplished,” Donziger had written in private notes several years earlier, during a flight to Ecuador. “I cannot wait to get off the plane and see my fellow soldiers--often the only people I feel who get me. I want to look in their eyes and see if they understand the enormity of what this team has accomplished.” He had gone toe-to-toe with one of the most powerful multinationals in the world and won the largest pollution verdict in history: $19 billion. That was billion with a “b,” real money by anyone’s standard. If he could survive the vengeful countersuit and collect the judgment, the Ecuador case would, in Donziger’s expansive estimation, create a precedent benefitting “millions of persons victimized by human rights abuses committed by multinational corporations pursuing economic gain.” And it would make him a very wealthy man.Arriving at the Ocean Grill, he slowed his bicycle. The surveillance sedan--Wait, were there two of them?--kept cruising south. Donziger chained his bike to a NO PARKING sign and shrugged off his backpack. The spy cars disappeared in traffic. He knew they would circle back. They always did.Chapter TwoPRESSURESix years before he played cat-and-mouse in Manhattan with oil company private eyes, Donziger was headed one cool morning to the Palacio de Justicia in Quito, Ecuador. “We are going down to have a little chat with the judge,” he told the documentary film crew he had invited to follow him. He emphasized the word “chat” in a way that sounded menacing. “This is something you would never do in the United States,” he continued. “But in Ecuador, this is how the game is played. It’s dirty. We have to--occasionally--use pressure tactics to neutralize their corruption, and today is one of those examples.”Donziger was not an ordinary lawyer. Just out of Harvard Law School, he had worked briefly in a conventional job as a public defender, representing teenagers accused of street crime. But that was a long time ago. The Ecuador oil pollution case had allowed him to grow into what he wanted to be--a human rights advocate, a rabble-rouser, a performance artist with a law degree. Clarence Darrow meets Martin Luther King Jr. meets Abbie Hoffman.On this day, he aimed to convince an Ecuadorian judge to block Chevron’s attempt to inspect a laboratory Donziger’s team was using to analyze pollution evidence. The company alleged that the lab was incompetent and crooked. Donziger countered that the lab was fine; it was the oil company, he said, that was dishonestly harassing the plaintiffs. As he told the American film crew scrambling to keep up with him, justice in Ecuador often resembled a back-alley brawl.Donziger and his entourage entered the courthouse and walked down a narrow hallway toward the judge’s office. He had arranged for Ecuadorian television news stations to cover the confrontation. Donziger ushered several cameramen into the judge’s chamber, a cubbyhole space that got so crowded there was no room to turn around. The judge, an elderly bald man, cowered at his desk, blinking behind large eyeglasses. “I sat down in the chair directly in front of the judge,” Donziger later recalled, “where he could smell my breath.”“I am part of the plaintiffs’ legal team,” Donziger told the judge. The American lawyer wore a charcoal suit with a blue shirt and muted red tie. As a non-Ecuadorian, he did not have the right to speak in court as a lawyer, but technicalities did not deter Donziger. He rose to his feet, drew himself to his full height, and with piercing brown eyes peered down at the judge. “You have to be very careful with the Texaco lawyers,” he began in American-accented Spanish. “They play dirty. They are trying to corrupt a legal process that thirty thousand Ecuadorians are carrying out. They are fighting for their lives.” He repeated: “For their lives.”The judge was breathing heavily, as if he might have a heart attack.Donziger cited no Ecuadorian statute or precedent. He invoked only his own ferocious indignation. “They are trying to use you, Your Honor, to do an inspection that is not legal,” he lectured. “Please be careful. Please be very careful.”The trembling judge announced on the spot that he would suspend the laboratory inspection “in order to study the issue further.” He placed a feeble hand on the sheaf of legal papers on his desk and added: “That’s what I have to offer you.”At that moment, Diego Larrea, one of the oil company’s lawyers, entered the judge’s office. Larrea had learned belatedly of Donziger’s preemptive strike.“You’ve suspended the order?” Larrea asked the judge, incredulous. “Your Honor, it must be clear, this is another maneuver.”Donziger, towering over Larrea, who stood a good six inches shorter, assumed an expression of unrestrained wrath. “This is a corrupt Texaco lawyer!” he bellowed, pointing a long finger at Larrea. In fact, Chevron had subsumed Texaco five years earlier. Chevron paid Larrea’s fees and was the defendant in the litigation. But Texaco had been the oil company active in Ecuador years earlier, and it was Texaco (pronounced locally “Tek-ZAH-ko”) that would resonate with Ecuadorian television viewers.“Sir,” Larrea said, turning to Donziger and pointing back at him, “you are going to be held responsible for what you say.”“I take responsibility, sir. You are a corrupt lawyer.” His voice rising theatrically, Donziger repeated the epithet with relish, abogado Tek-ZAH-ko corrupto: “You are a corrupt Texaco lawyer! You are a corrupt lawyer!”The TV cameras swiveled from combatant to combatant. The judge, unwilling or unable to restore order, reared back from his desk, but there was no place to escape. Finally, a flustered secretary took it upon herself to announce: “This is becoming personal! Step out, please!” The verbal rumble moved to the hallway, TV news and documentary cameras rolling.Later, Donziger coolly assessed his performance. “Very effective,” he wrote in his notes. “Talk about corruption, talk about how they try to use innocent and good people as vehicles for their own corruption.” He had accomplished his purpose, both in the judge’s office and with Ecuadorian television viewers.Chapter ThreeARRIVALThe righteous fury Donziger could summon seemingly at will on behalf of his rain forest clients flowed in equal parts from deeply felt empathy with their plight and his acute thespian instincts. One can genuinely care for the powerless while relishing the role of their protector.In the personal notes he kept on a laptop comupter, Donziger recalled his first visit to a tribe called the Cofan along the Aguarico River: “When I arrived in the village, I could see the desperation and hope that was being projected onto my presence.” He wondered whether he “could deliver any tangible benefit” to the Indians, “either then or ever.” He hated what he saw as “the desperation in the eyes of the children, and the hollow resignation in the eyes of their parents.”To honor him, the Cofan children sang traditional story songs for Donziger. Performing without musical accompaniment, the shabbily dressed choir described a time long before their birth when the forest was unspoiled, a common theme of the tribal repertoire. The children performed a dance in Donziger’s honor, dipping their hands in symbolic oil to illustrate what had befallen their culture and the rain forest they lived in and depended on. An elderly woman who sang with the children wore a colorful toucan feather through her nose, the sharpened tip penetrating one nostril, passing through the cartilage, and exiting the other nostril.Emergildo Criollo, the leader of the Cofan community, initially had mixed feelings about Donziger. He appreciated that the American lawyer had trekked to the remote enclave but found the outsider overwhelming. Donziger spoke too loudly and waved his arms in a manner that made the Indians uneasy. The intricacies of the court proceedings he described eluded the Cofan. But Criollo came to trust him. “He spent time with us,” the tribal leader said. “We saw this gringo lawyer had great passion.”The chain of events that had brought Donziger to Criollo’s village began more than four decades before the lawyer’s first visit. One day, when Criollo was a boy of six, a helicopter appeared above the treetops. “We were all amazed at the noise it made,” he told me, remembering the remarkable 1964 encounter. “Which type of animal is this that comes flying from so high in the sky?”Criollo saw the bulbous metal bird disgorge a number of white men in trousers and wide-brimmed hats. At the time, his father was teaching him to use a blow pipe and poison-tipped darts to hunt howler monkeys. The Cofan spoke a local language called A’ingae. A few knew Spanish because of earlier interaction with missionaries and rubber traders, but none of them knew the language spoken by the men from the sky. “We were scared,” Criollo said, “so we hid.”1The helicopters continued to arrive, delivering other strange machines. “Day and night, they cut the trees. There were explosions and fires. The white men were digging holes.” Criollo and other members of the tribe wondered what they were looking for. He and his father crept to the edge of a clearing the outsiders had carved. “They were eating lunch. They gave us rice. It was the first time we tasted rice, and it was delicious.” The yellow cheese the Indians were given smelled terrible to them, so they threw it into the jungle.The Cofan lived a relatively isolated existence. They hunted, fished, and grew vegetables, mostly without interference from Hispanic Ecuador. In the late nineteenth century, rubber harvesters and traders had invaded the area and subjected several generations of Indians to brutal debt servitude. The intruders receded and then disappeared during the global depression of the 1930s, giving the Cofan and other tribes several decades of respite before the arrival of the new outsiders seeking oil and sowing fresh disruption. During all this time, the Indians also encountered American Protestant missionaries and Spanish Catholics. The foreign Christians provided machetes, mirrors, and clothing, in addition to Bible lessons. Some Indians went to live at missionary settlements, abandoning villages and straining clan ties.1 Criollo told me the oilmen were the first Americans he ever encountered. In fact, an American missionary family named Borman had had extensive contact with the Cofan as early as 1955, nine years before Texaco arrived. Given Criollo’s young age at the time of these events, it is not surprising that his chronology is slightly inaccurate.

Where to Download Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett

Most helpful customer reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful. Greek tragedy in many acts By A Super Cool Amazon Reviewer Bro "This is a tale with no shortage of knaves and villains." -- Paul Barrett, Law of the JunglePaul Barrett has written a very good primer to the saga of Steven Donziger's guerrilla war against Chevron and Chevron's relentless carpet bombing counter-attack. It could be tougher on Chevron, it is true. But, Barrett is fairer than I would have thought when in background I read furious denunciations of the book by Steven Donziger and people sympathetic to him.I can safely say that I have never done as much background material reading and research for any book review as I have for this. I read Judge Kaplan's opinion and appeals of it. I read articles by the Chevron legal team on the use of Section 1782, and, frankly was impressed by their tenaciousness. I read Karen Hinton's twitter feed and Huffington Post article. I spent some time on Steve Donziger's webpage. I read the (rather clearly ghostwritten) affidavit of Pablo Farjado. With all that, although I think that Paul Barrett could have given more time over to Chevron's misdeeds, for the most part, his narrative was faithful to what I learned from my own research.The topic is also incredibly polarizing. I am sure that a researcher at an agency hired by Chevron will soon be typing up an analysis of my comments along with a summary of my biography and my perceived biases and weaknesses. And, some earnest intern at Amazon Watch will probably be doing much the same, though with less attention to the order of the email addresses of the recipients that she sends it to. (You may think I'm exaggerating, but take a look at the wikipedia page of William Langewiesche. He's an amazing writer, but he made the mistake of writing an overly sympathetic piece, Jungle Law, the title of which Barrett riffs on, about the Ecuadorian plaintiffs. Chevron obtained Donziger's email correspondence with him, which revealed that he was, well overly sympathetic, to Donziger, et al. Consequently his entire wiki profile deals with Chevron's take on his "bias.")So let's put all that aside. Is the book fair to all parties? Basically yes.Barrett does a good job of laying out the history of the region and Texaco's actions. Texaco cut a deal with Ecuador's government to extract the oil from the region. No one cared much about the indigenous people. Best practices for extracting oil involved slightly more expensive processes of lining waste pits to prevent ground water contamination and reinjection of byproducts into the ground. Texaco did neither, instead leaving vast ecological devastation in its path. Barrett goes to great pains to stress that the Ecuadorian national oil company didn't do much better. Google the actual human damage. It's pretty stunning. Barrett discusses some of it, but his analysis is fairly cursory and this is a flaw of the book.Enter Steven Donziger, an ambitious Harvard Law graduate, former Latin American investigative journalist, and man on a mission. Donziger is a dynamic showman figure capable of charming and alienating in equal measure. He has been fighting this case for the past twenty years. Donziger is a fascinating, larger than life character. Since he graduated from law school in 1991, he's only had one case--this one. Like Tom Hagen, he has a very special practice.Donziger does an amazing job of shepherding this litigation, surviving an endless series of Chevron's litigation gambits--at one point filing 37 motions in a single hour, this stratagem due apparently to an Ecuadorian rule of judicial administration that requires motions to be ruled on in three days, or the judge must be replaced--acquiring litigation funding to resist Chevron's attempts to outlast the Ecuadorians, and getting celebrity and media attention and support to publicize it. Ultimately, he obtains a $19 billion judgment against Chevron in an Ecuadorean court. But, his cult of personality falters at a crucial moment, allowing Chevron to gain the upper hand. As a result, Chevron was able to bring a suit in New York that places the Ecuadorian plaintiffs' entire recovery into question.The Donziger case is an interesting look into what ethical lapses are and are not permitted in the American legal system. Chevron's counsel may be aware of numerous bad acts by their clients. There is even evidence that Chevron has provided a comfortable living for fact witnesses, what ruder people might call a bribe. Yet, the American legal system has a difficult time reaching these ethical problems. Donziger, however, has acted flamboyantly and played fast and loose in filings and in public statements. The American legal system, aided by able and well-funded counsel on the other side, has no difficulty dealing with such issues when brought to their attention.Although Texaco polluted the Ecuadorean jungle, Chevron doesn't get a pass either. Chevron's corporate counsel's arrogance and unwillingness to settle this case, not to mention overly clever strategy in getting the case dismissed in New York and insisting that the plaintiffs refile in Ecuador, still may cost them very dearly, the current success of Gibson Dunn's Hail Mary RICO action against Donziger notwithstanding.My end conclusion is that the Ecuadorian plaintiffs would have been sanctioned in American court, but their verdict would stand. It is clear that both parties engaged in very tough extra-litigation tactics. Chevron appears to have thrown money around to judicial and non-judicial actors like a drunken sailor. Donziger and company embraced the philosophy of politics trumping legal principles too freely. Judge Kaplan is a distinguished and capable jurist, but his willingness to accept representations by Chevron while not scrutinizing the impact of Chevron's own misdeeds may have led to Donziger receiving a less than fair result in his courtroom. I was particularly stunned by his command to Judge Zambrano that he not refresh his memory by consulting his opinion when he was on the stand. That was probably erroneous.Paul Barrett has written a vital and interesting book. But, the story is not over yet. Donziger is currently appealing Judge Kaplan's ruling to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which has already reversed Judge Kaplan once. Read the book and then don't stop reading.Update: Yesterday, the Second Circuit heard Donziger's appeal. In a shocker, Judge Wesley asked if there was any reason why the 2nd Circuit couldn't deem the Ecuadorian judgment tainted but allow Donziger to refile in Manhattan! Unlikely, but yet another twist.Recommended.

24 of 33 people found the following review helpful. World-class investigative journalism, and a painstakingly detailed and evenhanded account of an infuriating story By Lachlan Markay I would say that Mr. Barrett's account of this epic legal and political battle reads like a John Grisham novel, but that would be selling short its nuance, painstaking detail, and moral ambiguity. There are no good guys in this story - he reserves deserved condemnation for the corrupt plaintiffs' attorneys in the case, the oil company responsible for pollution in the Amazon, and the Ecuadorian government complicit in that pollution. Its only ethically uncompromised characters are the indigenous Ecuadorians whose lives have been destroyed as the book's antagonists go to war over what quickly devolves into a brutal and vindictive legal, political, and public relations battle.Many, including a number of reviewers here (whom I suspect are motivated more out of a reflexive hostility to Big Oil than a well grounded and sincere concern about the real victims in this case), see the Chevron/Donziger affair as one of moral absolutes, David and Goliath, the good guys vs. bad guys. The lesson of Law of the Jungle is simply that no such dichotomy exists. Texaco (later acquired by Chevron) could have cleaned up pollution in the Amazon for a relative pittance when it left the country in the early 90s. Plaintiffs and environmental activists could have prioritized actual cleanup efforts over their attempts to score an historic win over a Designated Villain. The Ecuadorian government could have honored its contractual obligations to clean up areas of the rainforest in which its state-owned company had operated. None of that happened, and the impoverished residents of Lago Agrio and the surrounding areas have suffered greatly as a result.The book's central character, crusading trial lawyer and activist Steven Donziger, is a perfect microcosm of the story's moral ambiguity. We find ourselves siding with him as he signs on to the case, fresh out of law school, and sharing his righteous indignation at Texaco's inexcusable refusal to take responsibility for its actions in Ecuador. By the end of the book, it's clear that not only has Donziger ceded any moral high ground and lapsed into an utterly unethical (and possibly criminal) campaign of deception, but that he has actively impeded efforts to mitigate the real problems in Ecuador in an effort to secure a court verdict that he sees as both a moral crusade and a means of personal aggrandizement.Unsurprisingly, Donziger has taken to attacking Barrett for his work. True to form, many of his claims are utterly and bizarrely devoid of any semblance of accuracy. (For example, he claims on his personal blog that Barrett "scarcely mentions lead Ecuadorian attorney Pablo Fajardo," when in fact Fajardo is a central character of the book, mentioned perhaps more often than any other individual but Donziger himself.)Law of the Jungle is the most exhaustive, painstakingly researched, evenhanded account of this epic battle to date. Read it if you're tired of the usual "good vs. evil" moralizing of contentious environmental debates. You won't put it down with much faith in either side of these sorts of disputes, but you will have gained a fuller understanding of the compromises inherent in global politics, law, trade, environmentalism, and economic development, and with a deeper appreciation for investigative journalism that can illuminate our understanding of complex and controversial issues.It's also just a damn good read.

12 of 16 people found the following review helpful. An epic struggle for justic By Malvin "Law of the Jungle" by Paul M. Barrett is a fascinating reconstruction and analysis of the famous class action lawsuit filed against Texaco (later Chevron) on behalf of the indigenous people of Ecuador. Mr. Barrett is a best-selling author who has written extensively about the landmark case including research gathered first-hand in the U.S. and Ecuador. This highly readable, engaging and dramatic book narrates an epic struggle for justice against entrenched corporate and governmental power, vice and corruption.Mr. Barrett focuses much of the story on the attorney, Steven Donziger who championed the cause of the tribal peoples of the rainforest. Donziger's flair for public relations in the 1990s helped gain attention for the lawsuit including support from celebrities around the world (in fact, I was one of those inspired by the struggle and co-wrote Save the Rainforest, a tune featuring Larry King on vocals, that made a passing reference to these events). But Mr. Barrett shows us that, sadly, there was much more to the fairy tale, David-versus-Goliath story than most of us realized.Mr. Barrett details the many cynical twists and turns that ensued over twenty years of proceedings as Donziger did whatever he felt was necessary to win. Mr. Barrett allows the reader leeway to consider whether it may have been a personal desire for wealth, prestige or some other character flaw that might have driven Donziger to the point of recklessness, a Harvard graduate whose acquaintances include some of the most powerful people on the planet. Mr. Barrett's story makes it abundantly clear that Donziger's actions crossed an ethical line that ultimately made it a simple matter for Chevron to dismiss the case. It seems that Donziger made a fool of nearly everyone; while crushing the hopes of the poor suffering people of the Ecuadorian rainforest to gain the justice they so richly deserved.I highly recommend this painstakingly researched and bittersweet book to everyone.

See all 120 customer reviews... Law of the Jungle: The $19 Billion Legal Battle Over Oil in the Rain Forest and the Lawyer Who'd Stop at Nothing to WinBy Paul M. Barrett